GoArch talk:Apocrypha: Difference between revisions
From Guild of Archivists
(Created page with "==Namespace suggestions== "Fanon" is an obvious one, but I've never really cared for the term, and it may still be too officious. --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Namespace suggestions== | ==Namespace suggestions== | ||
===Fanon=== | |||
It's an obvious one, but I've never really cared for the term, and it may still be too officious. Definitely willing to entertain alternatives. --[[User:Alahmnat|Alahmnat]], Grand Master ([[User_talk:Alahmnat|talk]]) 22:08, 4 January 2017 (PST) | |||
===Apocrypha=== | |||
Also not a personal favorite, tbh. If anything, it swings too far to the other side of the scale from "fanon" in terms of indicating its reliability. I prefer to leave this for things that are demonstrably ''not'' canon, like the Riven Journals or the Dark Horse comics. --[[User:Alahmnat|Alahmnat]], Grand Master ([[User_talk:Alahmnat|talk]]) 22:08, 4 January 2017 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 06:08, 5 January 2017
Namespace suggestions
Fanon
It's an obvious one, but I've never really cared for the term, and it may still be too officious. Definitely willing to entertain alternatives. --Alahmnat, Grand Master (talk) 22:08, 4 January 2017 (PST)
Apocrypha
Also not a personal favorite, tbh. If anything, it swings too far to the other side of the scale from "fanon" in terms of indicating its reliability. I prefer to leave this for things that are demonstrably not canon, like the Riven Journals or the Dark Horse comics. --Alahmnat, Grand Master (talk) 22:08, 4 January 2017 (PST)
