Editing Book

From Guild of Archivists
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 15: Line 15:
== Types of Books ==
== Types of Books ==
=== Descriptive Book ===
=== Descriptive Book ===
[[File:Riven_descriptive_book.jpg|thumb|The [[Riven]] descriptive book.]]
A '''Descriptive Book''' is where a Writer fully describes the Age to which they wish to link. These volumes are typically very large, with a considerable number of pages, suitable for the extensive descriptions needed to craft a stable link. There can only ever be one Descriptive Book for an Age. Because ''regestoy'' is capable of accessing the infinite possibilities of the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation|quantum mechanical multiverse]], it is highly improbably (though not strictly ''impossible'') for two Descriptive Books to ever link to the same Age, even if their descriptions match exactly.<ref>Email, RAWA. "[[Reference:RAWA/1997 Lyst posts#Re: More linking issues|Re: More linking issues]]". 1997.</ref><ref name="RAWA 1998" /> There are always too many variables left undefined to guarantee that a link is forged to the same place twice.
A '''Descriptive Book''' is where a Writer fully describes the Age to which they wish to link. These volumes are typically very large, with a considerable number of pages, suitable for the extensive descriptions needed to craft a stable link. There can only ever be one Descriptive Book for an Age. Because ''regestoy'' is capable of accessing the infinite possibilities of the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation|quantum mechanical multiverse]], it is highly improbably (though not strictly ''impossible'') for two Descriptive Books to ever link to the same Age, even if their descriptions match exactly.<ref>Email, RAWA. "[[Reference:RAWA/1997 Lyst posts#Re: More linking issues|Re: More linking issues]]". 1997.</ref><ref name="RAWA 1998" /> There are always too many variables left undefined to guarantee that a link is forged to the same place twice.


Please note that all contributions to Guild of Archivists may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see GoArch:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)