Editing Reference:DRC Discussions forum/Authorized Books
From Guild of Archivists
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==January 16, | ==January 16, 2003 - Dr. Kodama== | ||
It’s begun, whether we like it or not. | It’s begun, whether we like it or not. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Dr. K. | Dr. K. | ||
==January 20, | ==January 20, 2003 - Victor Laxman== | ||
It should be easy for them to tell the difference – we always use those official looking D’ni book pedestals for books that we’ve approved. | It should be easy for them to tell the difference – we always use those official looking D’ni book pedestals for books that we’ve approved. | ||
v | v | ||
==January 22, | ==January 22, 2003 - Dr. Kodama== | ||
It doesn’t seem hard for someone to put an unofficial book on an official pedestal. | It doesn’t seem hard for someone to put an unofficial book on an official pedestal. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Dr. K | Dr. K | ||
==January 22, | ==January 22, 2003 - Marie Sutherland== | ||
I agree that an additional indication of approval would be beneficial. It would also serve as a reminder to explorers that if they ever find a book without the approval stamp to notify the DRC and not use the book themselves. | I agree that an additional indication of approval would be beneficial. It would also serve as a reminder to explorers that if they ever find a book without the approval stamp to notify the DRC and not use the book themselves. | ||
Marie | Marie | ||
==January 22, | ==January 22, 2003 - Dr. Watson== | ||
Sounds good to me. Let’s get together and standardize on placement of the stamp so explorers can easily determine a Book’s approval status. | Sounds good to me. Let’s get together and standardize on placement of the stamp so explorers can easily determine a Book’s approval status. | ||
Dr. W. | Dr. W. | ||
