Difference between revisions of "Reference:DRC Discussions forum/Authorized Books"
Moiety Jean (talk | contribs) m (Dates were wrong on two message entries. Changed dates from 2002 to 2003 and placed them at the end of the discussion where they make sense contextually.) |
Cjherkeless (talk | contribs) m (fixed dates to 2002) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==January 16, | + | ==January 16, 2002 - Dr. Kodama== |
It’s begun, whether we like it or not. | It’s begun, whether we like it or not. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Dr. K. | Dr. K. | ||
| − | ==January 20, | + | ==January 20, 2002 - Victor Laxman== |
It should be easy for them to tell the difference – we always use those official looking D’ni book pedestals for books that we’ve approved. | It should be easy for them to tell the difference – we always use those official looking D’ni book pedestals for books that we’ve approved. | ||
v | v | ||
| − | ==January 22, | + | ==January 22, 2002 - Dr. Kodama== |
It doesn’t seem hard for someone to put an unofficial book on an official pedestal. | It doesn’t seem hard for someone to put an unofficial book on an official pedestal. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Dr. K | Dr. K | ||
| − | ==January 22, | + | ==January 22, 2002 - Marie Sutherland== |
I agree that an additional indication of approval would be beneficial. It would also serve as a reminder to explorers that if they ever find a book without the approval stamp to notify the DRC and not use the book themselves. | I agree that an additional indication of approval would be beneficial. It would also serve as a reminder to explorers that if they ever find a book without the approval stamp to notify the DRC and not use the book themselves. | ||
Marie | Marie | ||
| − | ==January 22, | + | ==January 22, 2002 - Dr. Watson== |
Sounds good to me. Let’s get together and standardize on placement of the stamp so explorers can easily determine a Book’s approval status. | Sounds good to me. Let’s get together and standardize on placement of the stamp so explorers can easily determine a Book’s approval status. | ||
Dr. W. | Dr. W. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:04, 29 August 2020
Contents
January 16, 2002 - Dr. Kodama[edit]
It’s begun, whether we like it or not.
And since even more are probably on the way, safety is now an issue.
I’m becoming worried about the Books. Visitors are going to need to know which have been approved by us and, more importantly, which haven’t.
Ideas?
Dr. K.
January 20, 2002 - Victor Laxman[edit]
It should be easy for them to tell the difference – we always use those official looking D’ni book pedestals for books that we’ve approved.
v
January 22, 2002 - Dr. Kodama[edit]
It doesn’t seem hard for someone to put an unofficial book on an official pedestal.
How about an official stamp to signify approval?
Dr. K
January 22, 2002 - Marie Sutherland[edit]
I agree that an additional indication of approval would be beneficial. It would also serve as a reminder to explorers that if they ever find a book without the approval stamp to notify the DRC and not use the book themselves.
Marie
January 22, 2002 - Dr. Watson[edit]
Sounds good to me. Let’s get together and standardize on placement of the stamp so explorers can easily determine a Book’s approval status.
Dr. W.
