GoArch talk:MOULa approval: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
--[[User:CalumTraveler(263)|CalumTraveler(263)]], ([[User_talk:CalumTraveler(263)|talk]]) 2:45, 4 June 2021 (MDT) | --[[User:CalumTraveler(263)|CalumTraveler(263)]], ([[User_talk:CalumTraveler(263)|talk]]) 2:45, 4 June 2021 (MDT) | ||
A google form could be useful, yes. It have to be easy to find, so link pinned on OU discord maybe? And GoW forum. | |||
ametist | |||
Latest revision as of 14:52, 5 June 2021
Let's talk[edit source]
The day has come. After conversing with GreyDragon at Cyan, fan-created content on the official shard is properly considered to be Unexplored Branches material, and he has recommended that we work with the Guild of Writers and Cyan's lore team (which, to be transparent, I'm also a member of) to ensure that, going forward, new additions are vetted not just for technical compatibility, but also for lore compatibility.
What does that process look like? I am open to any and all suggestions.
--Alahmnat, Grand Master (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2021 (PDT)
I would think maybe a google form they fill out with details and links to the work they have done. Have the form send emails to the lore team and others.
--Hazado, Lowly technical engineer (talk) 1:14, 4 June 2021 (PDT)
Seconding the above google form idea for an initial 'file an age for review' stage.
Once that's done there should probably be a designated repository for uploading completed or in-progress age concepts or documents for review- pullable to Minkata Alpha for physical inspection/testing/iterations?
--CalumTraveler(263), (talk) 2:45, 4 June 2021 (MDT)
A google form could be useful, yes. It have to be easy to find, so link pinned on OU discord maybe? And GoW forum. ametist
